Volume : 10, Issue : 04, April – 2023
Title:
13.RISK PREDICTION AND PROGNOSIS IN PATIENTS PRESENTING WITH ACS: THE GRACE, CADILLAC AND KILLIP CLASS AND TIMI RISK INDEX COMPARISON.
Authors :
Mamdouh Mohammed Mahbub, Fathy Mohammed Ahmed Nanoush, Abdulaziz Mastoor Mohammed Alswat, Fahad Ahmed Mohammed Hamdi
Abstract :
Background: Cardiovascular disease remains the most common cause of death and disability in developed countries (1). According to a World Health Organization report published in 2012, around 7.4 million deaths occurred from CHD globally, accounting for 42% of cardiovascular-related deaths and 13% of worldwide death (2). A reliable method of risk assessment for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) during the treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is needed due to differences in clinical appearance and mortality in patients with this condition to Planning early treatment, discharge, and rehabilitation for ASC patients, conducting research following ACS, and accelerate the final treatment decision all benefit from the application of risk stratification (3,4)
Aim: To determine the predictive accuracies of the GRACE risk score, CADILLAC, TIMI risk index and Killip class for patients that been diagnosis as Acute Coronary Syndrome. And find out which of them is the most accurate between them
Methods: This single-center retrospective study involved 88 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who was admitted in King Faisal Medical Complex in Taif, Makkah, in the period from May 2019 to November 2021. The GRACE, TIMI, and Killip class scores were compared for their predictive ability.
Results: A total of 88 patients [65 men (73.9%) and 23 women (26.1%), with the mean age (±standard deviation, SD) of 60.3±12.9 years] were enrolled in this study. There were 59 NSTEMI/UA and 29 STEMI patients in our study. There were significant differences regarding patient age (p<0.001), TRI (p<0.001), CADILLAC score (p<0.001) and GRACE score (p<0.001) in all patients between the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. The area under the ROC curves for TRI was 0.954 (95% CI: 0.901-1.000, p=0.001) in the prediction of the severity of CAD (GRS >140) in patients with ACS. And ROC curves for CADILLAC was 0.859 (95% CI: 0.767-950, p=0.001) in the prediction of the severity of CAD (GRS >140) in patients with ACS.
Conclusions: Our study is significant since it is the first in the field of literature to compare GRS, TRI and CADILLAC and to investigate how they relate to GRS were evaluated in the same patient population. In this study, in this research, we believe that information regarding patient short- and long-term mortality as well as information about the severity and extent of CAD may be obtained from the calculated of GRS or TRI and CADILLAC of patients who are admitted to the emergency department with ACS.
Cite This Article:
Please cite this article in press Mamdouh Mohammed Mahbub et al, Risk Prediction And Prognosis In Patients Presenting With Acs: The Grace, Cadillac And Killip Class And Timi Risk Index Comparison., Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2023; 10 (04).
Number of Downloads : 10
References:
1. Simoons, M.L., 2003. Cardio-vascular disease in Europe: challenges for the medical profession: Opening address of the 2002 Congress European Society of Cardiology.
2. Organization WHO, 2014. Global Status Report on Non-Communicable Diseases, World Health, 176. (cited 2015). Available from: http://www.who.int/global-coordination-mechanism/publications/global-status-report-ncds-2014-eng.pdf.
3. Collinson, J., Flather, M.D., Fox, K.A.A., Findlay, I., Rodrigues, E., Dooley, P., Ludman, P., Adgey, J., Bowker, T.J. and Mattu, R., 2000. Clinical outcomes, risk stratification and practice patterns of unstable angina and myocardial infarction without ST elevation: Prospective Registry of Acute Ischaemic Syndromes in the UK (PRAIS-UK). European heart journal, 21(17), pp.1450-1457.
4. Hillis, L.D. and Lange, R.A., 2009. Optimal management of acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med, 360(21), pp.2237-2240.
5. Barbosa, C.E., Viana, M., Brito, M., Sabino, M., Garcia, G., Maraux, M., Souza, A.C., Noya-Rabelo, M., Esteves, J.P. and Correia, L.C.L., 2012. Accuracy of the GRACE and TIMI scores in predicting the angiographic severity of acute coronary syndrome. Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 99(3), pp.818-824.
6. Méndez-Eirín, E., Flores-Ríos, X., García-López, F., Pérez-Pérez, A.J., Estévez-Loureiro, R., Piñón-Esteban, P., Aldama-López, G., Salgado-Fernández, J., Calviño-Santos, R.A., Rodríguez, J.M.V. and Vázquez-González, N., 2012. Comparison of the prognostic predictive value of the TIMI, PAMI, CADILLAC, and GRACE risk scores in STEACS undergoing primary or rescue PCI. Revista Española de Cardiología (English Edition), 65(3), pp.227-233.
7. E Backus, B., J Six, A., H Kelder, J., B Gibler, W., L Moll, F. and A Doevendans, P., 2011. Risk scores for patients with chest pain: evaluation in the emergency department. Current cardiology reviews, 7(1), pp.2-8.
8. D’Ascenzo, F., Biondi-Zoccai, G., Moretti, C., Bollati, M., Omedè, P., Sciuto, F., Presutti, D.G., Modena, M.G., Gasparini, M., Reed, M.J. and Sheiban, I., 2012. TIMI, GRACE and alternative risk scores in Acute Coronary Syndromes: a meta-analysis of 40 derivation studies on 216,552 patients and of 42 validation studies on 31,625 patients. Contemporary clinical trials, 33(3), pp.507-514.
9. Wiviott, S.D., Morrow, D.A., Frederick, P.D., Giugliano, R.P., Gibson, C.M., McCabe, C.H., Cannon, C.P., Antman, E.M. and Braunwald, E., 2004. Performance of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk index in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-3 and-4: a simple index that predicts mortality in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 44(4), pp.783-789.
10. Granger, C.B., Goldberg, R.J., Dabbous, O., Pieper, K.S., Eagle, K.A., Cannon, C.P., Van de Werf, F., Avezum, A., Goodman, S.G., Flather, M.D. and Fox, K.A., 2003. Predictors of hospital mortality in the global registry of acute coronary events. Archives of internal medicine, 163(19), pp.2345-2353.
11. Killip III, T. and Kimball, J.T., 1967. Treatment of myocardial infarction in a coronary care unit: a two year experience with 250 patients. The American journal of cardiology, 20(4), pp.457-464.
12. Becker, R.C., Burns, M., Gore, J.M., Spencer, F.A., Ball, S.P., French, W., Lambrew, C., Bowlby, L., Hilbe, J., Rogers, W.J. and of Myocardial, F.T.N.R., 1998. Early assessment and in-hospital management of patients with acute myocardial infarction at increased risk for adverse outcomes: a nationwide perspective of current clinical practice. American heart journal, 135(5), pp.786-796.
13. Wu, A.H., Parsons, L., Every, N.R. and Bates, E.R., 2002. Hospital outcomes in patients presenting with congestive heart failure complicating acute myocardial infarction: a report from the Second National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI-2). Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 40(8), pp.1389-1394.
14. DeGeare, V.S., Boura, J.A., Grines, L.L., O’Neill, W.W. and Grines, C.L., 2001. Predictive value of the Killip classification in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. The American journal of cardiology, 87(9), pp.1035-1038.
15. Halkin, A., Singh, M., Nikolsky, E., Grines, C.L., Tcheng, J.E., Garcia, E., Cox, D.A., Turco, M., Stuckey, T.D., Na, Y. and Lansky, A.J., 2005. Prediction of mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: the CADILLAC risk score. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 45(9), pp.1397-1405.
16. de Araújo Gonçalves, P., Ferreira, J., Aguiar, C. and Seabra-Gomes, R., 2005. TIMI, PURSUIT, and GRACE risk scores: sustained prognostic value and interaction with revascularization in NSTE‐ACS. European heart journal, 26(9), pp.865-872.
17. Ramsay, G., Podogrodzka, M., McClure, C. and Fox, K.A., 2007. Risk prediction in patients presenting with suspected cardiac pain: the GRACE and TIMI risk scores versus clinical evaluation. Journal of the Association of Physicians, 100(1), pp.11-18.
18. Bradshaw, P.J., Ko, D.T., Newman, A.M., Donovan, L.R. and Tu, J.V., 2007. Validation of the Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk index for predicting early mortality in a population-based cohort of STEMI and non-STEMI patients. Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 23(1), pp.51-56.
19. Acet, H., Ertaş, F., Akıl, M.A., Özyurtlu, F., Polat, N., Bilik, M.Z., Aydın, M., Oylumlu, M., Yüksel, M., Yıldız, A. and Kaya, H., 2016. Relationship between hematologic indices and global registry of acute coronary events risk score in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, 22(1), pp.60-68.
20. Tang, E.W., Wong, C.K. and Herbison, P., 2007. Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) hospital discharge risk score accurately predicts long-term mortality post acute coronary syndrome. American heart journal, 153(1), pp.29-35.
21. Salem, B., Ouali, S., Hammas, S., Bougmiza, I., Gribaa, R., Ghannem, K., Neffati, E., Remadi, F. and Boughzela, E., 2011, January. Correlation of TIMI risk score with angiographic extent and severity of coronary artery disease in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. In Annales de Cardiologie et D’angeiologie (Vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 87-91).
22. Mega, J.L., Morrow, D.A., Sabatine, M.S., Zhao, X.Q., Snapinn, S.M., DiBattiste, P.M., Gibson, C.M., Antman, E.M., Braunwald, E. and Théroux, P., 2005. Correlation between the TIMI risk score and high-risk angiographic findings in non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: Observations from the Platelet Receptor Inhibition in Ischemic Syndrome Management in Patients Limited by Unstable Signs and Symptoms (PRISM-PLUS) trial. American heart journal, 149(5), pp.846-850.
23. Sato, T., Saito, Y., Matsumoto, T., Yamashita, D., Saito, K., Wakabayashi, S., Kitahara, H., Sano, K. and Kobayashi, Y., 2021. Impact of CADILLAC and GRACE risk scores on short-and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Journal of Cardiology, 78(3), pp.201-205.