Volume : 11, Issue : 02, February – 2024

Title:

A REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS

Authors :

Dornala Chaitanya Dixit, S. Sandeep

Abstract :

Intellectual property rights (IPR) have been noted as research ideas, inventions, innovative works, creative expressions based on which there is a public willingness to bestow the status of property. IPR shows certain exclusive rights to the researcher’s, scientific company’s, shareholders, inventors or creators of certain property, in order to enable them to reap commercial benefits from their creative efforts or reputation. There are several types of intellectual property protection like patent, copyright, trademark, trade secret, trade dress etc. Patent is a recognition for an invention, which satisfies the criteria of global novelty, non-obviousness, and industrial application. IPR is prerequisite for better identification, planning, commercialization, rendering, and thereby protection of invention or creativity. Each innovative works evolves its own IPR policies, management style, strategies, and so on depending on its area of specialty. currently pharma profession evolving IPR strategy requiring a better focus and approach in the future era. It was mainly published and governed by world trade organisation.
Keywords: intellectual property right, patent, copyrights, trademarks, trade secret, designs, utility models, bio diversity and IPR, geographical indications.

Cite This Article:

Please cite this article in press S. Sandeep et al., A Review Of Intellectual Property Rights, Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2024; 11 (02).

Number of Downloads : 10

References:

1.https://web.archive.org/web/20160929180424/https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/ copyright
2. Singh DR. Law relating to intellectual property: a complete comprehensive material on intellectual property covering acts, rules, conventions, treaties, agreements, digest of cases and much more. Universal Law Publishing Company; 2008.
3. Delhi N. Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India; 2002. Anonymous. Research and development statistics.
4. Delhi N. Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Government of India; 2002. Anonymous. Research and development in industry: An overview.
5. Bainbridge DI. Intellectual property. Pearson Education; 2009.
6.https://www.abounaja.com/blogs/history-of-intellectual-property#:~:text=The%20earliest%20records%20relating%20to,from%20the%20rising%20of%20bread.
7. https://www.wipo.int/technology-transfer/en/ip-policies.html
8.https://web.archive.org/web/20210815125633/https://www.wipo.int/about-ip/en/universities_research/ip_policies/index.html
9.https://www.springer.com/cda/content/document/cda_downloaddocument/9783540777366-c1.pdf?SGWID=0-0-45-579400-p173796662.
10. Cottier T, Abbott F. The international intellectual property system: commentary and materials. The International Intellectual Property System. 1999:1-2122.
11. Copyright in Historical Perspective, p. 136-137, Patterson, 1968, Vanderbilt Univ. Press
12. Day O’Connor, Sandra (2002). “Copyright Law from an American Perspective”. Irish Jurist. 37: 16–22. JSTOR 44027015.
13. Bettig, Ronald V. (1996). Copyrighting Culture: The Political Economy of Intellectual Property. Westview Press. p. 9–17. ISBN 0-8133-1385-6.
14. Ronan, Deazley (2006). Rethinking copyright: history, theory, language. Edward Elgar Publishing. p. 13. ISBN 978-1-84542-282-0 – via Google Books
15. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_909_2016.pdf
16. Owen, L. (2001). “Piracy”. Learned Publishing. 14: 67–70. doi:10.1087/09531510125100313. S2CID 221957508
17. Butler, S. Piracy Losses “Billboard” 199(36)
18. Tobias Kretschmer; Christian Peukert (2014). “Video Killed the Radio Star? Online Music Videos and Digital Music Sales”. Cep Discussion Paper. Social Science Electronic Publishing. ISSN 2042-2695. SSRN 2425386
19. “IP Commission Report” (PDF). NBR.org. Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 October 2022. Retrieved 1 September 2021.
20. “Advertising Fuels $1.34 Billion Illegal Piracy Market, Report by Digital Citizens Alliance and White Bullet Finds”. Digital Citizens Alliance. Retrieved 2 September 2021.
21. Nimmer, David (2003). Copyright: Sacred Text, Technology, and the DMCA. Kluwer Law International. p. 63. ISBN 978-90-411-8876-2. OCLC 50606064 – via Google Books.
22. “Copyright Term and the Public Domain in the United States.”, Cornell University.
23. See Peter B. Hirtle, “Copyright Term and the Public Domain in the United States 1 January 2015” online at footnote 8 Archived 26 February 2015 at the Wayback Machine.
24. Lawrence Lessig, Copyright’s First Amendment, 48 UCLA L. Rev. 1057, 1065 (2001)
25. “A patent is not the grant of a right to make or use or sell. It does not, directly or indirectly, imply any such right. It grants only the right to exclude others. The supposition that a right to make is created by the patent grant is obviously inconsistent with the established distinctions between generic and specific patents, and with the well-known fact that a very considerable portion of the patents granted are in a field covered by a former relatively generic or basic patent, are tributary to such earlier patent, and cannot be practiced unless by license thereunder.” – Herman v. Youngstown Car Mfg. Co., 191 F. 579, 584–85, 112 CCA 185 (6th Cir. 1911)
26. “What are intellectual property rights?”. WTO.org. World Trade Organization. Archived from the original on 2019-07-06. Retrieved 2016-05-23.
27. Stuart Wall; Sonal Minocha; Bronwen Rees (2009). International Business. Financial Times Prentice Hall. p. 43. ISBN 978-0273723721. Archived from the original on 2023-08-28. Retrieved 2021-03-13. patents, trademarks and copyrights. These are often referred to as intellectual property rights .
28. “1502 Definition of a Design [R-08.2012]”. Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. USPTO. Archived from the original on 7 January 2015. Retrieved 7 January 2015.
29. “General Information About 35 U.S.C. 161 Plant Patents”. USPTO. Archived from the original on 7 January 2015. Retrieved 7 January 2015.
30. Charles Anthon, A Classical Dictionary: Containing An Account of the Principal Proper Names Mentioned in Ancient Authors, And Intended To Elucidate All The Important Points Connected With The Geography, History, Biography, Mythology, And Fine Arts Of The Greeks And Romans Together With An Account Of Coins, Weights, And Measures, With Tabular Values Of The Same, Harper & Bros, 1841, p. 1273.
31. Phylarchus of Naucratis, “The Deipnosophists, or, Banquet of the Learned of Athenæus”, Translated from Ancient Greek by H.Bohn 12:20, p. 835
32. Robert Patrick Merges. Patent Law and Policy: Cases and Materials. 7th ed., Chapter 1.
33. “Wolfgang-Pfaller.de: Patentgesetz von Venedig” (in German and Italian). Archived from the original on 2007-06-30
34. M. Frumkin, “The Origin of Patents”, Journal of the Patent Office Society, March 1945, Vol. XXVII, No. 3, pp. 143 et seq.
35. DLA Piper Rudnick Gray Cary (2005). “Patent Litigation across Europe”. cecollect.com. Archived from the original on 2007-10-06
36. Katz, Michael L.; Shapiro, Carl (1985). “On the Licensing of Innovations”. The RAND Journal of Economics. 16 (4): 504–520. doi:10.2307/2555509. ISSN 0741-6261. JSTOR 2555509. Archived from the original on 2022-02-07. Retrieved 2022-02-07.
37. Schmitz, Patrick W. (2002). “On Monopolistic Licensing Strategies under Asymmetric Information”. Journal of Economic Theory. 106 (1): 177–189. doi:10.1006/jeth.2001.2863. Archived from the original on 2022-06-15. Retrieved 2022-02-07.
38. “Problems with Apache license and Others Involving Copyright Uses”. Pastebin.com. Archived from the original on 2021-08-29. Retrieved 2021-08-29.
39. “Assignee (Company) Name”. Help Page. U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). Archived from the original on 2007-08-14. Retrieved 2007-07-25
40. Sonnemaker, Tyler. “No, an artificial intelligence can’t legally invent something – only ‘natural persons’ can, says US patent office”. Business Insider. Archived from the original on 3 January 2021. Retrieved 26 August 2020.
41. Article 28.2 TRIPs Archived 2017-06-22 at the Wayback Machine: “Patent owners shall also have the right to assign, or transfer by succession, the patent and to conclude licensing contracts.”.
42. “Diamond v. Chakrabarty”. Oyez. Chicago-Kent College of Law. Archived from the original on 2021-01-02. Retrieved 2020-12-16.
43. “Patent Requirements (BitLaw)”. www.bitlaw.com. Archived from the original on 2020-11-11. Retrieved 2020-12-16.
44. USPTO web site, Patent Marking and “Patent Pending” (Excerpted from General Information Concerning Patents print brochure) Archived 2009-08-02 at the Wayback Machine, Consulted on August 5, 2009.
45. UK Intellectual Property Office web site, Display your rights Archived 2009-09-03 at the Wayback Machine, Consulted on August 5, 2009.
46. http://www.european-patent-office.org/epo/new/cost_analysis_2005_en.pdf
47. “Holland & Bonzagni a full Service IP Law Firm in WesternMassachusetts”. www.hblaw.org. Archived from the original on 14 April 2016. Retrieved 4 May 2018.
48. Olson, D.S. (2009). “Taking the Utilitarian Basis for Patent Law Seriously: The Case for Restricting Patentable Subject Matter”. Temple Law Review. 82: 1
49. Baten, Jörg; Labuske, Kirsten (2009). “On the Persistence of Human Capital and Patient Effects Around 1900 on Per Capita Levels in the 1960s”. Brussels Economic Review. 52-2/3: 289–304.
50. Stim, Rishand, “Profit from Your Idea: How to Make Smart Licensing Decisions”, ISBN 1413304508
51. Kim, Linsui (2002). “Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Rights: Lessons from Korea’s Experience”. Unctad/Ictsd. UNCTAD/ICTSD Working Paper.
52. http://www.uspto.gov/trademarks/basics/definitions.jsp
53. http://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/tm/t-about/t-whatis.htm
54. “U.S. Customs Today – February 2002 – an Untimely Christmas Delivery”. Archived from the original on 23 October 2011. Retrieved 27 December 2012.
55. https://www.owe.com/resources/proper-trademark-usage/
56. https://www.owe.com/resources/proper-trademark-usage/
57. Bodenhausen, G.H.C. (1969). Guide to the Application of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property As Revised at Stockholm in 1967 (PDF). United International Bureaux for the Protection of Intellectual Property (BIRPI). p. 22. ISBN 92-805-0368-5. Retrieved 28 December 2016
58. https://www.wipo.int/patents/en/topics/utility_models.html
59. https://www.wipo.int/pct/en/newslett/practical_advice/pa_052018.html
60.https://www.ipaustralia.gov.au/patents/how-to-apply-for-a-standard patent/innovation-patents
61. https://1patent.ru/blog/poleznie-modeli/preobrazovanie-patenta-na-poleznuyu-model-v-patent-na-izobretenie.html
62. https://sojuzpatent.com/ru/Prochee/Detail/2
63. World Intellectual Property Organization (2021). “Geographical indications An introduction, 2nd edition”. www.wipo.int. doi:10.34667/tind.44179. Retrieved 2021-09-17.
64. World Intellectual Property Organization (2021). “Geographical indications An introduction, 2nd edition”. www.wipo.int. doi:10.34667/tind.44179. Retrieved 2021-09-17.
65. Lin, Thomas C.W. (8 October 2013). “Executive Trade Secrets”. Notre Dame Law Review. 87 (3): 911. SSRN 2047462. Retrieved 20 February 2020.
66. Png, I. P. L. (2017-09-01). “Secrecy and Patents: Theory and Evidence from the Uniform Trade Secrets Act”. Strategy Science. 2 (3): 176–193. doi:10.1287/stsc.2017.0035. ISSN 2333-2050.
67. Robert P. Merges, Peter S. Menell, Mark A. Lemley (@006) Intellectual Property in the Technological Age, 3rd ed.; Aspen
68. Baruch Lev (2001): Intangibles, Management, Measurement and Reporting, with comments by conference participants; Brookings Institution Press, 2001.
69. Elbaum, Dan (2011). “Human factors in information-age trade secret protection”. Cornell HR Review. Retrieved 2011-07-18.
70. Bagley & Dauchy (2018). The Entrepreneur’s Guide to Law and Strategy. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. pp. 501–502. ISBN 978-1-285-42849-9.
71. “Customer Lists as Trade Secrets”. The National Law Review. Dykema Gossett PLLC. 2009-12-30. Retrieved 2012-04-19