Volume : 11, Issue : 03, March – 2024

Title:

A REVIEW OF IN SILICO TOXICOLOGICAL STUDIES

Authors :

G. Neha*, Mrs. Padmajadevi. M. S., Mr. Dileep. C. Babu, Ms. Renjitha R.S, Ms. Hashima

Abstract :

In the realm of toxicology, where safety is paramount, in silico studies are emerging as a powerful and innovative approach to assessing the potential hazards of chemicals. Unlike traditional methods that rely on animal testing, in silico toxicology leverages the power of computational modeling to predict and analyse a chemical’s toxicity profile. This translates to a multitude of advantages. In silico methods offer a significant leap in efficiency. By utilizing computer models trained on vast datasets of existing chemical information, researchers can rapidly assess a new chemical’s potential to interact with biological systems. This eliminates the need for lengthy and resource-intensive animal testing in the initial stages of safety evaluation. In silico toxicology promotes a more ethical approach. By reducing or potentially eliminating the use of animals in safety testing, these computational methods align with the growing movement towards humane research practices. This is particularly important when dealing with chemicals for which obtaining sufficient quantities for animal testing might be impractical. Furthermore, in silico studies provide valuable insights for guiding further toxicological investigations. The predictions generated by these models help researchers prioritize which chemicals warrant more in-depth testing using cell-based assays or even animal models. This targeted approach optimizes resource allocation and streamlines the safety assessment process. However, it’s crucial to recognize that in silico toxicology is still a developing field. The accuracy of predictions hinges on the quality and comprehensiveness of the underlying data used to train the models. Additionally, these models often focus on specific toxicity endpoints, such as skin irritation or organ damage. Therefore, in silico methods are best employed as a complementary tool alongside traditional testing methods, providing a more comprehensive picture of a chemical’s safety profile. In conclusion, in silico toxicology represents a significant advancement in the field of safety assessment. By offering a faster, more ethical, and data-driven approach to predicting chemical toxicity, these computational methods hold immense promise for streamlining safety testing while promoting the development of safe and sustainable chemicals.
KEYWORDS: In silico toxicology, Toxicity, Computational modeling, Molecular Docking

Cite This Article:

Please cite this article in press G. Neha et al., A Review Of In Silico Toxicological Studies., Indo Am. J. P. Sci, 2024; 11 (03).

Number of Downloads : 10

References:

1. Arwa B. Raies, Vladimir B. Bajic. In silico toxicology: computational methods for the prediction of chemical toxicity. WIREs computational molecular science. 2016 January 06; 6(2): 147-172.
2. Kyung- Taek Rim. In silico prediction of toxicity and its applications for chemicals at work: Toxicology and Environmental Health Sciences. 2020 May 14; 12(1): 191-202.
3. Luis Miguel Valerio. In silico toxicology for the pharmaceutical science: Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 2009; 241(3): 356-70.
4. Naven RT, Greene N, Williams RV. Latest advances in computational genotoxicity prediction. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism and Toxicology. 2012; 8(12):1579–1587
5. Netzeva TI, Worth AP, Aldenberg T et al Current status of methods for defining the applicability domain of (quantitative) structure-activity relationships. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals. 2009;33(2):155–173.
6. John C Dearden. In silico prediction of drug toxicity. Journal of computer-aided molecular design. 2003;17 (2-4): 119-127.
7. Richard Judson. Public Databases Supporting Computational Toxicology. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B. 2010 June 21; 13 (2-4):218-231.
8. Nichola Gellatly, Fiona Sewell. Regulatory acceptance of in silico approaches for the safety assessment of cosmetic- related substances. Computational Toxicology. 2019;11(3):82-89.
9. Grace Patlewicz, Jeremy M Fitzpatrick. Current and Future Perspectives on the Development, Evaluation, and Application of in Silico Approaches for Predicting Toxicity. Chemical research in toxicology. 2016; 29(4): 438-451.
10. Olga Tcheremenskaia, Romualdo Benigni. Toward regulatory acceptance and improving the prediction confidence of in silico approaches: a case study of genotoxicity. Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology. 2021;17(8):987-1005.
11. N. Greene, R. Naven. Early toxicity screening strategies. CODD. 2009;12 (1):90-97.
12. Malloy T. Advancing alternatives analysis: the role of predictive toxicology in selecting safer chemical products and processes. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2017; 13:915–925.
13. Segall MD, Barber C. Addressing toxicity risk when designing and selecting compounds in early drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today. 2014; 19: 688–693.
14. Brinda Mahadevan, Ronald D Synder. Genetic toxicology in the 21st century: Reflections and future directions. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis. 2011 April 28;52 (5): 339-354.
15. Lakhyajit Boruah, Aparoop Das. In-Silico Drug Design: A revolutionary approach to change the concept of current Drug Discovery Process. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biological Research.2013;1(02):60.